摘要:良性前列腺增生 (benign prostatic hyperplasia,BPH) 是中老年男性常见的排尿障碍性疾病,也是泌尿外科临床诊疗中最为常见的疾病之一。下尿路症状 (lower urinary tract symptoms,LUTS) 主要包括储尿期症状 (尿频、尿急、尿失禁及夜尿增多等)、排尿期症状 (排尿等待、排尿困难及排尿间断等) 以及排尿后症状(尿不尽感、尿后滴沥等)。导致 LUTS的原因除了BPH 以外,还包括膀胱功能障碍、尿道及周围组织异常等。随着对 BPH及 LUTS的深入研究,以及循证医学的发展,各国泌尿外科学会BPH诊治指南的重心,从过去以BPH产生梗阻的解剖结构及病理诊治为主,转向了以 LUTS症状学诊治为主。2022年4月由 ELTERMAN等发表在 Canadian Urological Association Journal上的“加拿大泌尿外科学会男性下尿路症状/良性前列腺增生指南更新”一文,通过对2018版加拿大泌尿外科学会BPH诊治指南的更新,总结了继发于BPH的男性LUTS的最新诊治策略。本文对该指南更新内容进行介绍及解读。
图1 典型男性下尿路症状/良性前列腺增生患者诊断的检查步骤选择
图2 男性下尿路症状/良性前列腺增生管理流程 注:MLUTS为男性下尿路症状;BPH为良性前列腺增生;ED为勃起功能障碍;PDE5为磷酸二酯酶5;PSA为前列腺特异性抗原。
图 3 对保守/药物治疗无效或具有绝对手术指征的令人烦恼的下尿路症状治疗方法流程图
[1] ELTERMAN D, AUBE- PETERKIN M, EVANS H, et al. UPDATE- Canadian Urological Association guideline: Male lower urinary tract symptoms/benign prostatic hyperplasia [J]. Can Urol Assoc J, 2022, 16(8): 245-256.
[2] NICKEL JC, MENDEZ- PROBST CE, WHELAN TF, et al. 2010 Update: Guidelines for the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia [J]. Can Urol Assoc J, 2010, 4(5): 310-316.
[3] MCVARY KT, ROEHRBORN CG, AVINS AL, et al. Update on AUA guideline on the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia [J]. J Urol, 2011, 185(5): 1793-1803.
[4] GRATZKE C, BACHMANN A, DESCAZEAUD A, et al. EAU Guidelines on the Assessment of Non- neurogenic Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms including Benign Prostatic Obstruction [J]. Eur Urol, 2015, 67(6): 1099-1109.
[5] GRADE Guidelines 15. [Z]. Available at http://www. gradeworkinggroup.org/. Accessed Aug. 28, 2018.
[6] ABRAMS P, ANDERSSON KE, APOSTOLIDIS A, et al. 6th International Consultation on Incontinence. Recommendations of the International Scientific Committee: EVALUATION AND TREATMENT OF URINARY INCONTINENCE, PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE AND FAECAL INCONTINENCE [J]. Neurourol Urodyn, 2018, 37(7): 2271-2272.
[7] NICKEL JC, SAAD F. The American Urological Association 2003 guideline on management of benign- prostatic hyperplasia: a Canadian opinion [J]. Can J Urol, 2004, 11(2): 2186-2193.
[8] RAMSEY EW, ELHILALI M, GOLDENBERG SL, et al. Practice patterns of Canadian urologists in benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostate cancer. Canadian Prostate Health Council [J]. J Urol, 2000, 163(2): 499-502.
[9] COCKETT ATK, ASO Y, DENIS L, et al. Recommendations of the International Consensus Committee concerning: 1. Prostate symptom score (I- PSS) and quality of life assessment; 2. Diagnostic workup of patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of prostatism; 3. Patients evaluation for researchstudies; and 4. BPH treatment. In: Cockett ATK, Aso Y, Chatelain C, et al, eds. Proceedings of the first International Consultation on Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia [Z]. Paris: Scientific Communication 1991:279-340.
[10] BARRY MJ, FOWLER FJ, O'LEARY MP, et al. The American Urological Association symptom index for benign prostatic hyperplasia. The Measurement Committee of the American Urological Association [J]. J Urol, 1992, 148(5): 1549-1557,1564.
[11] ROBERTSON C, LINK CL, ONEL E, et al. The impact of lower urinary tract symptoms and comorbidities on quality of life: the BACH and UREPIK studies [J]. BJU Int, 2007, 99(2): 347-354.
[12] O'LEARY MP, WEI JT, ROEHRBORN CG, et al. Correlation of the International Prostate Symptom Score bother question with the-Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Impact Index in a clinical practice setting [J]. BJU Int, 2008, 101(12): 1531-1535.
[13] LEVITT JM, SLAWIN KM. Prostate-specific antigen and prostate- specific antigen derivatives as predictors of benign prostatic hyperplasia progression [J]. Curr Urol Rep, 2007, 8: 269-274.
[14] RENDON RA, MASON RJ, MARZOUKK, et al. Recommandations de l'Association des urologues du Canada sur le dépistage et le diagnostic précoce du cancer de la prostate [J]. Can Urol Assoc J, 2017, 11: 298-309.
[15] BOUHADANA D, NGUYEN DD, RAIZENNE B, et al. Evaluating the acceptability of an online patient decision aid for the surgical- management of lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia [J]. Can Urol Assoc J, 2021, 15(8): 247-254.
[16] LUKACS B, GRANGE JC, COMET D. One- year follow- up of 2829 patients with moderate to severe lower urinary tract symptoms treated with alfuzosin in general practice according to IPSS and a health- related quality- of- life questionnaire. BPM Group in General Practice [J]. Urology, 2000, 55(4): 540-546.
[17] TSUKAMOTO T, MASUMORI N, RAHMAN M, et al. Change in International Prostate Symptom Score, prostratespecific antigen and prostate volume in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia followed longitudinally [J]. Int J Urol, 2007, 14(4):321-324,325.
[18] CHAPPLE CR. Alpha- adrenoreceptor antagonist in the year 2000: Is there anything new? Curr Opin Urol, 2001, 11(1):9-16.
[19] MARBERGER M, HARKAWA R, DE LA ROSETTE J. Optimizing the medical management of benign prostatic hyperplasia [J]. Eur Urol, 2004, 45(4):411-419.
[20] BOZLU M, ULUSOY E, CAYAN S, et al. A comparison of four different alpha 1- blockers in benign prostatic hyperplasia patients with and without diabetes [J].Scand J Urol Nephrol, 2004, 38(5): 391-395.
[21] KIRBY RS. A randomized, double- blind crossover study of tamsulosin and controlled- release doxazosin in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia [J]. BJU Int, 2003, 91(1): 41-44.
[22] DE REIJKE TM, KLARSKOV P. Comparative efficacy of two alpha- adrenoreceptor antagonists, doxazosin and alfuzosin, in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms from benign prostatic enlargement [J]. BJU Int, 2004, 93(6): 757-762.
[23] HUTCHISON A, FARMER R, VERHAMME K, et al. The efficacy of drugs for the treatment of LUTS/BPH, a study in 6 European countries [J]. Eur Urol, 2007, 51(1): 207-215,215-216.
[24] WILT TJ, HOWE RW, RUTKS IR, et al. Terazosin for benign prostatic hyperplasia [J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002: CD003851.
[25] TAKMAZ T, CAN I. Clinical features, complications, and incidence of intraoperative floppy iris syndrome in patients taking tamsulosin [J]. Eur J Ophthalmol, 2007, 17(6): 909-913.
[26] MCCONNELL JD, BRUSKEWITZ R, WALSH P, et al. The effect of finasteride on the risk of acute urinary retention and the need for surgical treatment among men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Finasteride Long- Term Efficacy and Safety Study Group [J]. N Engl J Med, 1998, 338(9): 557-563.
[27] ROEHRBORN C- G, BOYLE P, NICKEL J- C, et al. Efficacy and safety of a dual inhibitor of 5- alpha-reductase types 1 and (dutasteride) in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia [J]. Urology, 2002, 60(3): 434-441.
[28] NGUYEN D- D, MARCHESE M, CONE E- B, et al. Investigation of Suicidality and Psychological Adverse Events in Patients Treated With Finasteride [J]. JAMA Dermatol, 2021,157(1):35-42.
[29] ANDERSON J- B, ROEHRBORN C- G, SCHALKEN J- A, et al. The progression of benign prostatic hyperplasia: examining the evidence and determining the risk [J]. Eur Urol, 2001, 39(4): 390-399.
[30] MARKS LS, ROEHRBORN CG, ANDRIOLE GL. Prevention of benign prostatic hyperplasia disease [J]. J Urol, 2006, 176(4 Pt 1): 1299-1306.
[31] MCCONNELL JD, ROEHRBORN CG, BAUTISTA OM, et al. The long- term effect of doxazosin, finasteride, and combination therapy on the clinical progression of benign prostatic hyperplasia [J]. N Engl J Med, 2003, 349(25): 2387-2398.
[32] ROEHRBORN CG, SIAMI P, BARKIN J, et al. The effects of dutasteride, tamsulosin and combination therapy on lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostatic enlargement: 2- year results from the CombAT study [J]. J Urol, 2008, 179(2): 616-621.
[33] BARKIN J, GUIMARAES M, JACOBI G, et al. Alphablocker therapy can be withdrawn in the majority of men following initial combination therapy with the dual 5alphareductase inhibitor dutasteride [J]. Eur Urol, 2003, 44(4): 461-466.
[34] NICKEL JC, BARKIN J, KOCH C, et al. Finasteride monotherapy maintains stable lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia following cessation of alpha blockers [J]. Can Urol Assoc J, 2008, 2(1): 16-21.
[35] KAPLAN SA, ROEHRBORN CG, ROVNER ES, et al. Tolterodine and tamsulosin for treatment of men with lower urinary tract symptoms and overactive bladder: a randomized controlled trial [J]. JAMA, 2006, 296(19):2319-2328.
[36] TUBARO A, BATISTA JE, NITTI VW, et al. Efficacy and safety of daily mirabegron 50 mg in male patients with overactive bladder: a critical analysis of five phase III studies [J]. Ther Adv Urol, 2017, 9(6): 137-154.
[37] KAPLAN SA, HERSCHORN S, MCVARY KT, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Mirabegron versus Placebo Add-On Therapy in Men with Overactive Bladder Symptoms Receiving Tamsulosin for Underlying Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Randomized, Phase 4 Study (PLUS) [J]. J Urol, 2020, 203(6): 1163-1171.
[38] CHAPPLE C, HERSCHORN S, ABRAMS P, et al. Tolterodine treatment improves storage symptoms suggestive of overactive bladder in men treated with alpha- blockers [J]. Eur Urol, 2009, 56(3): 534-541.
[39] KAKIZAKI H, LEE KS, YAMAMOTO O, et al. Mirabegron Add- on Therapy to Tamsulosin for the Treatment of Overactive Bladder in Men with Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms: A Randomized, Placebo- controlled Study (MATCH) [J]. Eur Urol Focus, 2020, 6(4): 729-737.
[40] KAPLAN SA, HE W, KOLTUN WD, et al. Solifenacin plus tamsulosin combination treatment in men with lower urinary tract symptoms and bladder outlet obstruction: a randomized controlled trial [J]. Eur Urol, 2013, 63(1): 158-165.
[41] DRAKE MJ, CHAPPLE C, SOKOL R, et al. Long-term safety and efficacy of single- tablet combinations of solifenacin and tamsulosin oral controlled absorption system in men with storage and voiding lower urinary tract symptoms: results from the NEPTUNE Study and NEPTUNE II open-label extension [J]. Eur Urol, 2015, 67(2): 262-270.
[42] ICHIHARA K, MASUMORI N, FUKUTA F, et al. A randomized controlled study of the efficacy of tamsulosin monotherapy and its combination with mirabegron for overactive bladder induced by benign prostatic obstruction [J]. J Urol, 2015, 193(3): 921-926.
[43] OELKE M, GIULIANO F, MIRONE V, et al. Monotherapy with tadalafil or tamsulosin similarly improved lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia in an international, randomized, parallel, placebo- controlledclinical trial [J]. Eur Urol, 2012, 61(5): 917-925.
[44] GACCI M, CORONA G, SALVI M, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors alone or in combination with alpha- blockers for lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia [J]. Eur Urol, 2012, 61(5): 994-1003.
[45] WEISS JP, HERSCHORN S, ALBEI CD, et al. Efficacy and safety of low dose desmopressin orally disintegrating tablet in men with nocturia: results of a multicenter, randomized, double- blind, placebo controlled, parallel group study [J]. J Urol, 2013, 190(3): 965-972.
[46] HABIB FK, WYLLIE MG. Not all brands are created equal: a comparison of selected components of different brands of Serenoa repens extract [J]. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis, 2004, 7(3): 195-200.
[47] BARRY MJ, MELETH S, LEE JY, et al. Effect of increasing doses of saw palmetto extract on lower urinary tract symptoms: a randomized trial [J]. JAMA, 2011, 306(12): 1344-1351.
[48] TACKLIND J, MACDONALD R, RUTKS I, et al. Serenoa repens for benign prostatic hyperplasia [J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2012, 12(12): CD001423.
[49] WILT T, ISHANI A, MAC DONALD R, et al. Pygeum africanum for benign prostatic hyperplasia [J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2002, 1998(1): CD001044.
[50] CORNU JN, AHYAI S, BACHMANN A, et al. A Systematic Review and Meta- analysis of Functional Outcomes and Complications Following Transurethral Procedures for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Resulting from Benign Prostatic Obstruction: An Update [J]. Eur Urol, 2015, 67(6): 1066-1096.
[51] REICH O, GRATZKE C, BACHMANN A, et al. Morbidity, mortality and early outcome of transurethral resection of the prostate: a prospective multicenter evaluation of 10,654 patients [J]. J Urol, 2008, 180(1): 246-249.
[52] AHYAI SA, GILLING P, KAPLAN SA, et al. Metaanalysis of functional outcomes and complications following transurethral procedures for lower urinary tract symptoms resulting from benign prostatic enlargement [J]. Eur Urol, 2010, 58(3): 384-397.
[53] ALEXANDER CE, SCULLION MM, OMAR MI, et al. Bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic obstruction [J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019, 12(12):CD009629.
[54] GEAVLETE B, GEORGESCU D, MULTESCU R, et al. Bipolar plasma vaporization vs m onopolar and bipolar TURP- A prospective, randomized, long- term comparison [J]. Urology, 2011, 78(4): 930-935.
[55] MUSLUMANOGLU AY, YURUK E, BINBAY M, et al. Transurethral resection of prostate with plasmakinetic energy:100 months results of a prospective randomized trial [J]. BJU Int, 2012, 110(4): 546-549.
[56] VARKARAKIS I, KYRIAKAKIS Z, DELIS A, et al. Long- term results of open transvesical prostatectomy from a contemporary series of patients [J]. Urology, 2004, 64(2): 306-310.
[57] LIN, Y, WU X, XU A, et al. Transurethral enucleation of the prostate vs. transvesical open prostatectomy for large benign prostatic hyperplasia: A systematic review and meta- analysis of randomized controlled trials [J]. World J Urol, 2016, 34(9): 1207-1219.
[58] NASPRO R, GOMEZ SF, MANICA M, et al. From “gold standard” resection to reproducible "future standard" endoscopic enucleation of the prostate: what we know about anatomical enucleation [J]. Minerva Urol Nefrol, 2017, 69(5): 446-458.
[59] NESTLER S, BACH T, HERRMANN T, et al. Surgical treatment of large volume prostates: a matched pair analysis com paring- the open, endoscopic (ThuVEP) and robotic approach [J]. World J Urol, 2019, 37(9): 1927-1931.
[60] AUTORINO R, ZARGAR H, MARIANO MB, et al. Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic and Laparoscopic Simple Prostatectomy: A European- American Multi- institutional Analysis [J]. Eur Urol, 2015, 68(1): 86-94.
[61] KORDAN Y, CANDA AE, KOSEOGLU E, et al. RoboticAssisted Simple Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review [J]. J Clin Med, 2020, 9(6): 1798.
[62] SCARCELLA S, CASTELLANI D, GAUHAR V, et al. Robotic- assisted versus open simple prostatectomy: Results from a systematic review and meta- analysis of comparative studies [J]. Investig Clin Urol, 2021, 62(6): 631-640.
[63] HERRMANN TR. Enucleation is enucleation is enucleation is enucleation [J]. World J Urol, 2016, 34(10): 1353-1355.
[64] CHEN CH, CHUNG CH, CHU HC, et al. Surgical outcome of anatomical endoscopic enucleation of the prostate: A systemic review and meta- analysis [J]. Andrologia, 2020, 52(8): e13612.
[65] El TAYEB MM, JACOB JM, BHOJANI N, et al. Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate in Patients Requiring Anticoagulation [J]. J Endourol, 2016, 30(7): 805-809.
[66] RIVERA M, KRAMBECK A, LINGEMAN J. Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate in Patients Requiring Anticoagulation [J]. Curr Urol Rep, 2017, 18(10): 77.
[67] ROMERO- OTERO J, GARCIA- GONZALEZ L, GARCIAGOMEZ B, et al. Factors Influencing Intraoperative Blood Loss in Patients Undergoing Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Large Multicenter Analysis [J]. Urology, 2019, 132: 177-182.
[68] IBRAHIM A, ALHARBI M, ELHILALI MM, et al. 18 years of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: a singlecenter experience [J]. J Urol, 2019, 202(4): 795-800.
[69] GILLING PJ, WILSON LC, KING CJ, et al. Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing holmium laser enucleation of the prostate and transurethral resection of the prostate: results at 7 years [J]. BJU Int, 2012, 109(3): 408-411.
[70] ZHU L, CHEN S, YANG S, et al. Electrosurgical enucleation versus bipolar transurethral resection for prostates larger than 70 ml: a prospective, randomized trial with 5- year followup [J]. J Urol, 2013, 189(4): 1427-1431.
[71] ELSHAL AM, SOLTAN M, EL- TABEY NA, et al. Randomised trial of bipolar resection vs holmium laser enucleation vs Greenlight laser vapo- enucleation of the prostate for treatment of large benign prostate obstruction: 3-years outcomes [J]. BJU Int, 2020, 126(6): 731-738.
[72] SWINIARSKI PP, STEPIEN S, DUDZIC W, et al. Thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (TmLEP) vs. transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP): evaluation of early results [J]. Cent European J Urol, 2012, 65(3): 130-134.
[73] ELZAYAT EA, ELHILALI MM. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP): long-term results, reoperation rate, and possible impact of the learning curve [J]. Eur Urol, 2007, 52(5): 1465-1471.
[74] THOMAS JA, TUBARO A, BARBER N, et al. A multicenter randomized noninferiority trial comparing greenLight- XPS laser vaporization of the prostate and transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic obstruction: two- yr outcomes of the GOLIATH study [J]. Eur Urol, 2016, 69(1): 94-102.
[75] AJIB K, MANSOUR M, ZANATY M, et al. Photoselective vaporization of the prostate with the 180- W XPS- Greenlight laser: Five- year experience of safety, efficiency, and functional outcomes [J]. Can Urol Assoc J, 2018, 12(7): E318-E324.
[76] BACHMANN A, TUBARO A, BARBER N, et al. 180- W XPS GreenLight laser vaporisation versus transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic obstruction: 6-month safety and efficacy results of a European Multicentre Randomised Trial- the GOLIATH study [J]. Eur Urol, 2014, 65(5): 931-942.
[77] BACHMANN A, SCHURCH L, RUSZAT R, et al. Photoselective vaporization (PVP) versus transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP): a prospective bi- centre study of perioperative morbidity and early functional outcome [J]. Eur Urol, 2005, 48(6): 965-971,972.
[78] RAJIH E, THOLOMIER C, HUEBER PA, et al. Evaluation of surgical outcomes with photoselective greenLight XPS laser vaporization of the prostate in high medical risk men with benign prostatic enlargement: a multicenter study [J]. J Endourol, 2017, 31(7): 686-693.
[79] NGUYEN DD, SADRI I, LAW K, et al. Impact of thepresence of a median lobe on functional outcomes of greenlight photovaporization of the prostate (PVP): an analysis of the Global Greenlight Group (GGG) Database [J]. World J Urol, 2021, 39(10): 3881-3889.
[80] LEE DJ, RIEKEN M, HALPERN J, et al. Laser vaporization of the prostate with the 180- W XPS- greenlight laser in patients with ongoing platelet aggregation inhibition and oral anticoagulation [J]. Urology, 2016, 91:167-173.
[81] MESKAWI M, HUEBER PA, VALDIVIESO R, et al. Complications and functional outcomes of high-risk patient with cardiovascular disease on antithrombotic medication treated with the 532- nm- laser photo- vaporization Greenlight XPS- 180 W for benign prostate hyperplasia [J]. World J Urol, 2019, 37(8): 1671-1678.
[82] RUSZAT R, WYLER S, FORSTER T, et al. Safety and effectiveness of photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) in patients on ongoing oral anticoagulation [J]. Eur Urol, 2007, 51(4): 1031-1038,1038-1041.
[83] BOWEN JM, WHELAN JP, HOPKINS RB, et al. Photoselective vaporization for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia [J]. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser, 2013, 13(2): 1-34.
[84] LOURENCO T, SHAW M, FRASER C, et al. The clinical effectiveness of transurethral incision of the prostate: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials [J]. World J Urol, 2010, 28(1): 23-32.
[85] DE LA ROSETTE JJ, LAGUNA MP, GRAVAS S, et al. Transurethral microwave thermotherapy: the gold standard for minimally invasive therapies for patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia [J]. J Endourol, 2003, 17(4): 245-251.
[86] D'ANCONA FC, VAN DER BIJ AK, FRANCISCA EA, et al. Results of high- energy transurethral microwave thermotherapy in patients categorized according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists operative risk classification [J]. Urology, 1999, 53(2): 322-328.
[87] GRAVAS S, LAGUNA P, KIEMENEY LA, et al. Durability of 30- minute high- energy transurethral microwave therapy for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a study of 213 patients with and without urinary retention [J]. Urology, 2007, 69(5): 854-858.
[88] VANDERBRINK BA, RASTINEHAD AR, BADLANI GH. Prostatic stents for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia [J]. Curr Opin Urol, 2007, 17(1): 1-6.
[89] SONKSEN J, BARBER NJ, SPEAKMAN MJ, et al. Prospective, randomized, multinational study of prostatic urethral lift versus transurethral resection of the prostate: 12- month results from the BPH6 study [J]. Eur Urol, 2015, 68(4): 643-652.
[90] ROEHRBORN CG, BARKIN J, GANGE SN, et al. Five year results of the prospective randomized controlled prostatic urethral L.I.F.T. study [J]. Can J Urol, 2017, 24(3):8802-8813.
[91] RUKSTALIS D, GRIER D, STROUP SP, et al. Prostatic Urethral Lift (PUL) for obstructive median lobes: 12 month results of the MedLift Study [J]. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis, 2019, 22(3): 411-419.
[92] MCVARY KT, GANGE SN, GITTELMAN MC, et al. Minimally invasive prostate convective water vapor energy ablation: a multicenter, randomized, controlled study for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia [J]. J Urol, 2016, 195(5): 1529-1538.
[93] MCVARY KT, GANGE SN, GITTELMAN MC, et al. Erectile and ejaculatory function preserved with convective water vapor energy treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia: randomized controlled study [J]. J Sex Med, 2016, 13(6):924-933.
[94] MCVARY KT, GITTELMAN MC, GOLDBERG KA, et al. Final 5- year outcomes of the multicenter randomized sham- controlled trial of a water vapor thermal therapy for treatment of moderate to severe lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia [J]. J Urol, 2021, 206(3): 715-724.
[95] GILLING P, ANDERSON P, TAN A. Aquablation of the prostate for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia: 1- Year Results [J]. J Urol, 2017, 197(6): 1565-1572.
[96] GILLING P, BARBER N, BIDAIR M, et al. WATER: A Double- Blind, Randomized, Controlled Trial of Aquablation® vs Transurethral Resection of the Prostate in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia [J]. J Urol, 2018, 199(5): 1252-1261.
[97] AMPARORE D, FIORI C, VALERIO M, et al. 3-Year results following treatment with the second generation of the temporary implantable nitinol device in men with LUTS secondary to benign prostatic obstruction [J]. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis, 2021, 24(2): 349-357.
[98] CHUGHTAI B, ELTERMAN D, SHORE N, et al. The iTind temporarily implanted nitinol device for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia: A multicenter, randomized, controlledtrial [J]. Urology. 2021, 153: 270-276.
[99] DE NUNZIO C, CANTIELLO F, FIORI C, et al. Urinary and sexual function after treatment with temporary implantable nitinol device (iTind) in men with LUTS: 6- month interim results of the MT- 06- study [J]. World J Urol, 2021, 39(6): 2037-2042.
[100] PISCO JM, RIO TINTO H, CAMPOS PINHEIRO L, et al. Embolisation of prostatic arteries as treatment of moderate to severe lower urinary symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign hyperplasia: results of short- and midterm follow-up [J]. Eur Radiol, 2013, 23(9): 2561-2572.
[101] CARNEVALE FC, ISCAIFE A, YOSHINAGA EM, et al.Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) vs. original and PErFecTED prostate artery embolization (PAE) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH): Preliminary results of a single- center, prospective, urodynamic- controlled analysis [J]. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 2016, 39(1): 44-52.
[102] GAO YA, HUANG Y, ZHANG R, et al. Benign prostatic hyperplasia: prostatic arterial embolization versus transurethral resection of the prostate- a prospective, randomized, and controlled clinical trial [J]. Radiology, 2014, 270(3): 920-928.
[103] SHIM SR, KANHAI KJ, KO YM, et al. Efficacy and safety of prostatic arterial embolization: Systematic review with meta- analysis and meta-regression [J]. J Urol, 2017, 197(2): 465-479.
[104] RUSSO G I, KURBATOV D, SANSALONE S, et al. Prostatic arterial embolization vs open prostatectomy: A 1- year matched- paaAnalysis of functional outcomes and morbidities [J]. Urology, 2015, 86(2): 343-348.
[105] ABT D, HECHELHAMMER L, MULLHAUPT G, et al. Comparison of prostatic artery embolisation (PAE) versus transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for benign prostatic hyperplasia: randomised, open label, non- inferiority trial [J]. BMJ, 2018, 361(19): k2338.
[106] BHATIA S, SINHA VK, HARWARD S, et al. Prostate artery embolization in patients with prostate volumes of 80 mL or more: A single-Institution retrospective experience of 93 patients [J]. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2018, 29(10): 1392-1398.
[107] KABLY I, ACHARYA V, RICHARDSON AJ, et al. Prostatic artery embolization in refractory hematuria of prostatic origin [J]. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol, 2020, 23(3): 100694.
[108] LUCAS MG, STEPHENSON TP, NARGUND V. Tamsulosin in the management of patients in acute urinary retention from benign prostatic hyperplasia [J]. BJU Int, 2005, 95(3): 354-357.
[109] MCNEILL SA, HARGREAVE TB, ROEHRBORN CG. Alfuzosin 10 mg once daily in the management of acute urinary retention: results of a double- blind placebo- controlled study [J]. Urology, 2005, 65(1):83-89,89-90.
[110] PATIL SB, RANKA K, KUNDARGI VS, et al. Comparison of tamsulosin and silodosin in the management of acute urinary retention secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia in patients planned for trial without catheter. A prospective randomized study [J]. Cent European J Urol, 2017, 70(3): 259-263.
[111] ABEAMS P, CARDOZO L, FALL M, et al. The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub- committee of the International Continence Society [J]. Neurourol Urodyn, 2002, 21(2): 167-178.
[112] CHAPPLE CR, OSMAN NI, BIRDER L, et al. The underactive bladder: a new clinical concept [J]. Eur Urol,2015, 68(3): 351-353.
[113] POTTS B, BELSANTE M, PETERSON A, et al. Bladder outlet procedures are an effective treatment for patients with urodynamically confirmed detrusor underactivity without bladder outlet obstruction [J]. J Urol, 2016, 195:e975.
[114] LOMAS DJ, KRAMBECK AE. Long- term Efficacy of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate in Patients With Detrusor Underactivity or Acontractility [J]. Urology, 2016, 97: 208-211.
[115] DELAKAS D, LIANOS E, KARYOTIS I, et al. Finasteride: a long- term follow- up in the treatment of recurrent hematuria associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia [J]. Urol Int, 2001, 67(1): 69-72.
[116] THOMPSON IM, GOODMAN PJ, TANGEN CM, et al.The influence of finasteride on the development of prostate cancer [J]. N Engl J Med, 2003, 349(3): 215-224.
[117] ANDRIOLE GL, BOSTWICK DG, BRAWLEY OW, et al. Effect of dutasteride on the risk of prostate cancer [J]. N Engl J Med, 2010, 362(13): 1192-1202.
[118] GRUBB RL, ANDRIOLE GL, SOMERVILLE MC, et al. The REDUCE follow- up study: low rate of new prostate cancer diagnoses observed during a 2- year, observational, followup study of men who participated in the REDUCE trial [J]. J Urol, 2013, 189(3): 871-877.
[119] KLOTZ L, CHETNER M, CHIN J, et al. Canadian Consensus Conference: The FDA decision on the use of 5ARIs [J]. Can Urol Assoc J, 2012, 6(2): 83-88.
柴攀,张铁铁,杜鹏.《加拿大泌尿外科学会男性下尿路症状/良性前列腺增生指南更新》解读[J]. 泌尿外科杂志(电子版),2023,15(4):3-16. DOI:10.20020/j.CNKI.1674-7410.2023.04.02
暂无相关信息!
2022年4月由ELTERMAN 等发表在 CanadianUrological Association Journal 上的“加拿大泌尿外科学会男性下尿路症状/良性前列腺增生指南更新”一文,通过对2018版加拿大泌尿外科学会(CanadianUrological Association,CUA)良性前列腺增生(benignprostatic hyperplasia,BPH)诊治指南的更新,总结了继发于 BPH 的男性下尿路症状(lower urinarytract symptoms,LUTS)的最新诊治策略。文中的信息包括对 2010 版指南的评审,以及从更新的MEDLINE中检索英文文献进一步获得的信息,也包括对最新的美国泌尿外科学会(American UrologicalAssociation,AUA)和欧洲泌尿外科学会指南的评审。该指南是针对50岁以上出现LUTS和良性前列腺增大(benign prostatic enlargement,BPE)和/或 良 性 前 列 腺 梗 阻(benign prostatic obstruction,BPO)的典型男性患者。与 BPO 以外的原因相关的男性 LUTS 可能需要更广泛的诊断检查和不同的治疗考虑。指南更新力求使其适用于所有正在经受LUTS或患有BPE的患者。该指南更新同时阐述了诊断和治疗两方面的问题。诊断指南描述了以下内容:必要项目,推荐项目,可选择项目以及不推荐项目。诊断指南的推荐项目以及治疗原则基于加拿大泌尿外科医师普遍认同的临床规范和(或)专家共识而建立。诊断性建议不提供推荐等级。治疗指南使用 GRADE分类法总结证据并提出治疗建议。
1 诊断指南
1.1 必要项目
1.2 推荐项目
1.2.1 症状量表 (包括烦恼程度评估)
1.2.2 前列腺特异性抗原
1.3 可选择项目
1.4 不推荐项目
1.5 考虑手术者的进一步检查
1.5.1 手术适应证
1.5.2 术前检查
2 治疗指南
2.1 治疗原则
2.2 治疗后随访
2.2.1 观察等待
2.2.2 药物治疗
2.2.3 手术治疗
2.3 药物治疗
2.3.1 α-受体阻滞剂
2.3.2 5α-还原酶抑制剂
2.3.3 联合治疗 (α-受体阻滞剂和 5-ARIs)
2.3.4 M 受体拮抗剂和 β-3 受体激动剂
2.3.5 M 受体拮抗剂或 β-3激动剂与 α-阻滞剂联合应 用
2.3.6 磷酸二酯酶 5 抑制剂
2.3.7 去氨加压素
2.3.8 植物制剂
2.4 手术治疗
2.4.1 经尿道前列腺电切术 (transurethral resection of the prostate,TURP)
2.4.2 开放性前列腺摘除术
2.4.3 微创前列腺摘除术
2.4.4 前列腺解剖内镜下剜除术
2.4.5 光选择性前列腺汽化术 (photoselective laser vaporization of prostate,PVP)
2.4.6 经尿道前列腺切开术 (transurethral incision of the prostate,TUIP)
2.4.7 微创技术
2.5 合并特殊情况的诊治
2.5.1 急性尿潴留
2.5.2 膀胱逼尿肌收缩力不足/下降
2.5.3 BPH相关血尿
2.5.4 不除外前列腺癌的BPH患者
3 解读
4 总结
BPH 继发的 MLUTS 仍然是困扰男性最常见的年龄相关疾病之一。随着人口老龄化的发展,越来越多的男性患者将从他们的保健医那里寻求建议及针对症状的治疗指导。本指南文件中提供的信息基于对现有最佳证据的共识评估,将有助于泌尿外科医生努力为患者提供最先进的医疗照护。
暂无相关信息!
暂无相关信息!